CDC-NPCR Success Stories Library
The CDC-NPCR Success Stories showcase how cancer registry data are used to improve public health. To ensure these stories are preserved and available as a resource to central registries and a wider audience, NCRA created this Success Stories Library. Learn how cancer registry data inform clinicians, public health departments, and researchers to advance cancer diagnosis and treatment.
The CDC-funded National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) is a population-based surveillance system of cancer registries established in 1992. NPCR supports the collection of high-quality data by central cancer registries through funding, technical assistance, and the development of software for collecting and processing data. Through NPCR, CDC supports central cancer registries in 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Pacific Island Jurisdictions, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Learn more about NPCR, including accessing the U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, at https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/.
The Success Stories are broken into five categories, Collaboration, Data & Reporting, Public Health Impact, Registry Operations, and Education & Training and then by year. Choose a category by clicking on a tab below and then view stories by year. To earn CE credit for viewing the Success Stories, check out the CDC-NPCR Success Story Quizzes.
- Collaboration
- Data Management & Reporting
- Public Health Impact
- Registry Operations
- Education & Training
Alaska - Collaborative Analysis on Colorectal Cancer in Alaska
Florida - New Frontiers -- Collecting Cancer Recurrence in Florida
Massachusetts - Cancer Initiatives Unit - A Perfect Partnership for Cancer Control Collaboration
Mississippi - Improving Lung Cancer Screening and Outcomes Through the Mississippi Lung Cancer Roundtable
New Hampshire - Partnerships Using Registry Data to Address Cancer Disparities in Rural Catchment Areas
Ohio - Student Volunteers Help Dermatology Offices Overcome Barriers to Reporting
Oklahoma - Building and Maintaining A Strong Advisory Committee
Pennsylvania - The Pennsylvania Cancer Control 2023-2033 Plan
Virginia - Using Registry Data for Action in Virginia’s Updated Cancer Plan
Washington State - Redevelopment of the Washington State Cancer Registry Advisory Committee
Wisconsin - Overcoming Small Area Cancer Surveillance Challenges
Florida - FCDS is Leading the Way-Implementing the Florida Cancer Plan through Collaboration and Partnerships
Georgia - Striving to Advance Prostate Cancer through Private and Public Partnership
Montana - Cancer Surveillance Data Guides State Cancer Planning Process
Nebraska - De-Identification Tool for HL7 Formatted Electronic Pathology Report
New Hampshire - A Quality Improvement Proof of Concept Exercising Using Pseudonymization to Identify Duplicate Cancer Cases Across State Boundaries
North Dakota - Collaboration with Setting Up Quest Data Reporting Successfully
South Dakota - The South Dakota Cancer Registry Partners with the South Dakota Cancer Coalition to Develop a Cancer Clinical Trials Dashboard
Virgin Islands - Data Contingency Plan
Virginia - Replenishing the Reporting Field from Within: Partnership to Internship
Delaware - Addressing the Breast Cancer Burden in Delaware through Partnerships
Mississippi - Helping Mississippi Partnership for Cancer Control (MP3C) Regional Coalitions Utilize Data
Nevada - Nevada Central Cancer Registry’s Legislative Accomplishments
Oregon - Quality Partners Assure Quality Data
Puerto Rico - The Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry - Geocoding Project: Right on Track
Tenessee - A Collaborative Approach to Addressing the Challenges Faced with Meaningful Use Reporting
Virgin Islands - When the Interstate Data Agreement is Not Just a “Sometimes” Source of Information
Georgia - Targeting Cancer Screening at the Worksite
Minnesota - Stakeholders Use Minnesota Cancer Reporting System (MCRS) Data in Cancer Screening Awareness Campaigns
New York - New York State Governor’s Cancer Research Initiative
Pacific Island - Case Collection Conundrum in the CNMI
West Virginia - Surge Capacity Support and Collaboration with the Division of Infectious Disease during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Arizona - Collaborations with Federal Facilities
Delaware - Strategic Partnerships to Advanced Cancer Surveillance in Delaware
Louisiana - Registry Data as the Foundation of Taking Aim at Cancer in Louisiana (TACL)
Maryland - Collaboration to Prioritize Lung Cancer Screening in Maryland
Massachusetts - Recruitment Success: Partnering with Dana-Farber Cancer Institute to Increase Enrollment in Breast Cancer Survivorship Study
Mississippi - Addressing the Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Mississippi
Pohnpei State-Micronesia - Collaborations to Improve Cancer Screening in Resource-Limited Settings Using Personal Connections to Improve Cancer Screening in a Remote Island Setting
Puerto Rico - Developing the Puerto Rico CLL & AML Profile
Florida - Reporting from the Veteran Administration Facilities
Georgia - Working Together to Improve Pediatric Cancer Reporting
Indiana - Identifying the Extent of the Cervical Cancer Burden in Indiana
Massachusetts - Cervical Cancer: What Has Age Got To Do With It?
Montana - Working Together to Describe Cancer Treatment Resources in Montana
New Jersey - Geographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer in New Jersey
Ohio - Using Data to Reduce Disparities in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening
South Carolina - Collboration as a Catalyst for Population Health: Using Cancer Registry Data for Evidence-based Systems Change in South Carolina
South Dakota - Collaboration to Improve Clinical Trial Participation in South Dakota
Utah - Added Value in Cancer Registry Data: Birth Certificates for Race, Ethnicity, and Place of Birth
Washington State - WSCR Data-Sharing Collaborations Highlight Potential Cost Savings for Community Partners
West Virginia - Using Registry Data to Reduce Breast Cancer Morbidity and Mortality
Wisconsin - How Wisconsin has Addressed the High Burden of Cancer Among its American Indian* Population, 2004 - 2018
Wyoming - Implementing Version18 with a Collaborative Approach
Arizona - Moving the Needle with Electronic Reporting
Delaware - Utilizing Delaware Cancer Registry Data to Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes in Delaware
Minnesota - Smartsheet® Registry Submission Tracker
US Affiliated Pacific Islands - The Next Step in the U.S. Pacific Data Visualization – Geo-mapping Cancer in the Republic of Palau
US Virgin Islands - Creating a Casefinding Tool
Utah - Development of an Electronic Provider Cancer Reporting Form using REDCap
West Virginia - Making Cancer Data Approachable Through County-Level Statistics
Alaska - From Paper to Electronic: A Multi-Year Journey Down the Path of Small Hospital Reporting
Arizona - Creating Templates for Data Publications and Common Queries
Delaware - Changes to Delaware Cancer Reporting
District of Columbia - DQ Improvement for Address at Diagnosis and Correction of Plastic Land Parcel Boundaries
Louisiana - Cancer Registry and Covid-19 Linkage in Louisiana
Massachusetts - Improving Visualization and Presentation of MCR Data to Increase Data Dissemination and Use
Michigan - A New Way to Display Michigan Cancer Data
West Virginia - When an SIR Won't Do-Complementary Approaches for Investigating Community Cancer Concerns
Colorado - Linking the All-Payers Claims Database (APCD) to the Colorado Central Cancer Registry: An Evaluation
Illinois - Implementation of Database to Track and Report Duplicate Cases
Kentucky - NPCR Data Modernization Initiative Helps Kentucky Improve Cancer Reporting
Maryland - Data Release Documentation for Researchers
Michigan - LexisNexis Linkage to Improve Social Security Number and Vital Status Information
Nebraska - Data Quality Control for Electronic Pathology Reporting
New York - Importance of Electronic Pathology Reporting for Rapid Case Ascertainment in Patient Contact Studies
North Carolina - The Hospital Discharge Dataset and Its Impact on Death Certificate Only Cases
North Dakota - North Dakota Cancer Data Mapping by Sub-County Level
Ohio - Using Cancer Registry Data to Revise and Evaluate Ohio’s Cancer Plan
Texas - Sub-County Level Data Analysis and Display: A Pilot
Wisconsin - Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System – Comparing Data Processing in 2019 and 2021: From Chaos to Control
Arkansas - Cancer Challenges Amid a Pandemic, and a Glimpse at Arkansas Data
District of Columbia - Improving and Maintaining High Data Quality Utilizing Bi-monthly Hospital Data Submission
Florida - Designing an Interactive Data Dashboard to Improve Communication of Cancer Data in Florida
Louisiana - Creating an Interactive Cancer Data Visualization in Louisiana
Ohio - Ohio Cancer Stats & Facts
South Carolina - Cancer Reporting During COVID-19: Still in This Together
Wisconsin - New Tool for Facilities: A Web-based Dermatology Form
Colorado - Using Tableau to Calculate and Display Customizable Cancer Data
Nebraska - Implementation of Electronic Pathology (ePath) Reporting
Nevada - How Missing Data Can Build Partnerships
Oregon - Using Quality Improvement Measures to Increase Non-Hospital Cancer Reporting in Oregon
Rhode Island - Rhode Island Sub-County Level Cancer Data Visualization
Utah - Improving Interstate Data Exchange by Sharing Electronic Pathology Reports
Virgin Islands - Prostate Cancer: Addressing Community Perception with Data
Wisconsin - Using Data to Address Cancer Inequities in Wisconsin
Arkansas - On the Rise: Exploring Methods to Improve Timely Cancer Reporting
California - Using Text Mining to Extract Systematic Treatment Information
District of Columbia - Utilizing DC Metafile to Reduce Abstracting Errors
Illinois - Development and Distribution of Infographics for Five Major Cancer Sites
Maine - Risk for Lung and Bronchus Cancer Higher in Women than Men in Maine
Maryland - As Time Goes By; Timeliness Evaluation of Hospital Reporting in Maryland
Michigan - Michigan Takes Steps to Improve Timeliness and Completeness and Accuracy of Submission of Data
Missouri - What can eMaRC do for Melanoma Reporting?
Nebraska - Examining the Disparities of Pediatric Cancer Incidence Using Early Case Capture Data
Nevada - Electronic Laboratory Reporting: Promising Practices and Achievements
North Carolina - Converting HL7 CDA Records into Viable Cancer Cases
North Dakota - Geo-Coding Activity at the NDSCR
Oregon - Using Cancer Registry Data for Strategic Planning
Pennsylvania - Interactive Cancer Statistics Dashboard
Puerto Rico - Visualizing Cancer Data Using Business Intelligence Interactive Dashboard
Republic of the Marshall Islands - Data Making a Difference: Using Cancer Registry Data and Processes to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Services in the Republic of the Marshall Islands
Rhode Island - Address Quality Review and Validation to Improve Geocode Matching
Vermont - Improving Social Security Number Reporting
Virginia - The Transition to Electronic Reporting
Arkansas - Arkansas Central Cancer Registry Transitions to SEER DMS
Maine - Cancer Among Older Adults in Maine
Minnesota - Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes Among Black Women in Minnesota
Mississippi - Mississippi Meets its Goal of 70% of Eligible Adults Screened for Colorectal Cancer by 2020
Puerto Rico - Use of Claims Data to Obtain the Cost of Cancer Care
South Carolina - Health Equity Project to Addresss Cancer Disparities in African American Men in South Carolina
Tennessee - Shelby County, TN Cluster Investigation Involving a Sterlization Facility
Washington - HPV Related Cancer Incidence Rates and Trends in Washington State
Arkansas - Understanding how COVID-19 is Affecting People with Cancer in Arkansas, 2021
Massachusetts - Using Cancer Registry Data to Address Prostate Cancer Treatment Disparities in Massachusetts
Minnesota - Data to Action: Improving Breast Cancer Screening Rates in Minnesota
California - Assessing the Burden of Tobacco Related Cancers in California
Delaware - Addressing the Lung Cancer Burden in Delaware
Kentucky - Improving Cancer Patient Care in Kentucky’s Community Hospitals
Mississippi - Addressing HPV-Related Cancers in Mississippi
Nebraska - Succeeding on So Many Different Levels
New Hampshire - Childhood Cancer in New Hampshire
North Carolina - Data Linkage between the NC CCR and the COVID-19 Tested Positive Cases in North Carolina
Texas - Tackling the High Rate of Liver Cancer in Texas
Vermont - COVID-19-Related Impacts on Vermont Hospital Cancer Registries
California - Describing the Burden of Cancer in California Rural and Frontier Areas
Florida - Cancer Risk in Florida Firefighters
Georgia - New Insight: Tumor Characteristics and Breast Cancer Racial Disparities
Idaho - Idaho’s County Cancer Profiles: Impact at the Local Level
Illinois - From Registry Data, to Analysis, to Dissemination: A Population-based Cancer Incidence Investigation
North Carolina - Facilitating Cancer Research in North Carolina- A Successful Partnership
Ohio - Incorporating Survival Analysis into Cancer Reporting and Program Planning
Pennsylvania - Ewing’s Family of Tumors, Childhood Cancer, and Radiation-Related Cancer Incidence Review
Washington State - Washington Oral Health Providers Promote Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Using HPV Immunization Rates and WSCR Data
West Virginia - County Cancer Profiles: Local-Level Statistics at a Glance
Colorado - A Novel Approach to Ensure Cancer Patients Receive Genetic Services
Delaware - Closing the Gap in Prostate Cancer Mortality for Black Men in Delaware
Mississippi - Adding Breast Cancer Screening to Your Football Playbook
New Hampshire - Melanoma in Young Women: Preventing Cancer in New Hampshire
New York State - The New York State Environmental Facilities and Cancer Map
Tennessee - Greene County Cancer Cluster Investigation
Colorado - Colorado's Triumph: Securing Vital Funding for the State Cancer Registry
Illinois - From Registry Data to Analysis To Dissemination: A Population-Based Cancer Incidence Investigation
Indiana - Turning Challenges into Opportunities: the Case of Indiana
Nevada - Data Empowerment: NCCR's Cancer Dashboard
North Carolina - Key Performance Indicator Dashboards
Colorado - Implementation of New and Emerging Biomarker Data Collection: The Colorado Experience
Indiana - Overcoming Change
Maryland - Monitoring, Accountability, and Workflow: Improving Cancer Registry Processes Using Power BI
Nevada - Small Steps Toward Big Changes
North Carolina - Streamlining the Creation of Abstracts from Electronic Pathology Reports
Oregon - Ongoing Benefits from the DQE
Pennsylvania - The Enhancement of the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry Over 30 Years
Rhode Island - Effective Time Management through Prioritization of Processing Case Reports
Vermont - Vermont Cancer Registry Twenty-Nine Years Later and How it All Began
Wisconsin - Evaluation of Death Clearance Casefinding Based on Hospital Discharge Records
Wyoming - Remote Working Across the Miles
Alabama - Achieving Federal Standards with Major Challenges
Arizona - Recruitment and Retention of Cancer Registrars for Central Registry Positions
Indiana - Implementing CTR (Certified Tumor Registrar) of the Month
Kansas - Virtual Office Registry versus Physical Office Registry
Louisiana - Improving Death Clearance Follow-back and how the COVID-19 Pandemic Validated our Efforts
Maine - Responding to Constituent Cancer Concerns: The Maine Cancer Registry’s Cancer Inquiry Group
New Hampshire - New Hampshire Childhood Cancer Recoding Audit
Pennsylvania - Focused Quality Evaluation of Cases Impacted by Change in Histology Coding Rules
Rhode Island - Monthly Data Receipts from Neighboring State to Improve Completeness and Timeliness
West Virginia - Expanding Research Access to West Virginia Cancer Registry Data
Arizona - Arizona Cancer Registry Develops Student Internship Program
Colorado - Colorado’s Transition to Full-time Remote Work Due to COVID-19
Maryland - MQAT: The Myriddian Quality Assessment Tool
Massachusetts - Massachusetts Cancer Registry Looks to the Future
Missouri - Data Quality as a Function of Education Effectiveness
Montana - Specialized Job Classification as a Tool for Recruitment of Certified Tumor Registrars
Nevada - How Linkages Can Improve Registry Data
North Dakota - Data Linkages in the North Dakota Statewide Cancer Registry
Oklahoma - The Four C’s of 2020: COVID-19, Confusion, Chaos, Coming Together
Oregon - Cancer Registry Transition - Real Life Experience
Pennsylvania - Transitioning to 100% Telework
Puerto Rico - Adjustment to Completeness Estimates after a Natural Disaster: The Puerto Rico Experience after Hurricane Maria
Rhode Island - A Cancer Surveillance Gap Was Filled by Resumption of Veterans Affairs Data Release
Virginia - Registry Workgroup Clears Hurdles to Cross Finish Line of Software Implementation!
Wyoming - Seamless Continuity and High Standards Sustained While Shifting Virtually During COVID-19
Alaska - The Challenges & Successes of Transitioning to CRS Plus after 18 Years with a Private Vendor
Kansas - Overcoming Registry Operation Challenges
Minnesota - A Picture is Worth a Thousand Minutes
Montana - Improving Geocoding Precision through the Addition of Local Data
New Jersey - Telecommuting: An Essential Component of Contingency Planning for Registry Operations
North Carolina - Successful Cancer Case Ascertainment Through Electronic Reporting
Oklahoma - Clear and Timely Communication with Oklahoma Cancer Reporters to Survive the 2018 Changes
Vermont - Systems Thinking Yields Process Improvements
Virginia - Recruitment Is Low Because Retention Is High!
Wyoming - Keeping Up With 2018 Changes/Implementation with Reduced Staff
Alabama - Increasing the Capacity for Research Using Quality Improvement
Arizona - Strategies to Increase Case Reporting: Identifying Innovative Methods to Find Missing Cases
Kansas - "When to," not "How to," When it Comes to Death Clearance
Virgin Islands - The Virgin Islands Central Cancer Registry (VICCR) Storms into Operation
Arkansas - Cancer Registry Management Training
Georgia - Project ECHO: A Georgia Story on Moving Knowledge and Building a Community
Kansas - Multifaceted Education Training Toward Data Quality
Nebraska - "Knowledge Fridays" Meets Nebraska Education Plan: Elevating Cancer Reporting Proficiency
South Dakota - Successful Education for SD Cancer Registrars
Texas - Filling the Void: CTR Course Classes with Virtual Connectivity
District of Columbia - FLCCSC – A Valuable Educational Tool in Times of COVID-19 with Future Potential for Expansion
Florida & South Carolina - Fundamental Learning Collaborative for the Central Surveillance Community: Sharing Education among and between Central Cancer Registries
Georgia - Use Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Platform to Improve Training During COVID-19
Oklahoma - Learning and Educational Development for Oklahoma Cancer Reporters
Pacific Island - Collaborating and Adapting Training to Overcome Resource Challenges